Opposing
the idea that is often present in the media that climate change is fictitious
or not a problem that is actually close to home,
Norgaard argues that this denial of scientific fact by American society in particular actually “poses a threat to present social organization”. She argues that people deny climate change because it is hard see tactile results of their individual impact and want to maintain a brighter state of mind, choosing not to think that they could individually be contributing to something as grave as climate change.
Norgaard argues that this denial of scientific fact by American society in particular actually “poses a threat to present social organization”. She argues that people deny climate change because it is hard see tactile results of their individual impact and want to maintain a brighter state of mind, choosing not to think that they could individually be contributing to something as grave as climate change.
In her
talk, Norgaard also noted that to most people, climate change is an
unimaginable variable but it is also a widely held tenant of common knowledge. This
reminded me almost instantly of Bamborough’s “Proof” in which he discusses common
sense and moral knowledge. I also connected her ideas of the denial of climate
change to cultural relativism, where it is American society that has decided by
way of the media and popular conception that climate change is not a problem or
does not actually exist. I am curious as to what Norgaard’s thoughts would be
on how to educate children about the existence and validity of climate change.
If we change the way the next generation thinks about climate change could we
step out of our veil of ignorance?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.