Morality plays a role in all aspects of our society, especially science. Chapter 21 in Shafer-Landeau’s “The Ethical Life” is an
excerpt from the book Moral Scepticism
and Moral Knowledge, by Renford Bambrough. Bambrough begins with the
example of a child given anesthetics before a painful surgery and explains how
this scenario places a moral obligation to make sure that the child is not in
unnecessary pain. Next, by establishing the existence of moral knowledge, Bambrough
tries to refute popular arguments made against the reality of moral knowledge (Bambrough
217). He places focus on five objections.
Showing posts with label Bambrough. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bambrough. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
The Proof: Morality Dominating Society
What If the Anesthesia Put Others at Risk?
In
“Proof”, written by Renford Bambrough, a scenario is proposed in
support of the existence of moral knowledge. Bambrough poses that
there is a child in need of surgery that would be painful for him in
the absence of anesthesia, and as Bambrough sees it, there is not
doubt that this child should receive it (as cited in Shafer-Landau,
2012, p.218). As someone with beliefs more aligned with moral
skepticism, I wondered whether or not this really was objective proof
of moral truths. As risky as it may be, I thought that I would at
least enter the conversation on this matter.
Just
today I found an article about the health risks to recovery room
hospital staff associated with exposure to waste anesthetic gas
exhaled by recovering patients (Cook, 2013). “Beware the Hidden
Dangers of Anesthesia” starts off by stating that anesthesia in the
operating room isn't the only area where these gases can cause harm,
and that even nurses in the recovery room may be at risk of exposure
to these gases which have potentially harmful health effects (Cook,
2013). These effects include mild problems such as nausea and
headaches, but also more serious complications like sterility,
miscarriages, cancer, and liver disease (Cook, 2013). The National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health claims that this problem
is even more pronounced in facilities that lack proper ventilation,
and the organization also suggests that systems be developed that
monitor the concentration level of anesthetic gases in breathing
zones (Cook, 2013).
Sunday, February 24, 2013
Bambrough's Evaluation of Typical Argument Against Moral Knowledge
Shafer-Landau's compilation of ethical readings, The Ethical Life, contains an excerpt from Renford Bambrough's 1979 book Moral Skepticism and Moral Knowledge in which Bambrough presents and tries to debunk five typical arguments moral skeptics use to deny the possibility of moral knowledge. In addition he also offers his own argument for the existence of moral knowledge.
Common Sense Tells Us...
Bambrough's argument against moral skepticism is highlighted in The Ethical Life. He argues five main points made by skeptics towards moral objectivity. Overall, Bambrough relates that his argument is similar to that of G.E. Moore's. Moore's argument consisted of proving the existence of an external world by pointing out he obvious. He had two hands, these are both material objects. Since there are at least 2 material objects; there is a materialistic, external world.
Labels:
Bambrough,
common sense,
Leslie,
objectivity,
skeptic,
skepticism
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)