According to Shafer-Landau if
something always makes us better off then it is reasonable to try and
acquire it; from a hedonistic perspective, the one thing that will
always make us better off is happiness. As autonomous human beings we
have the right to make choices, ultimately striving to make choices
that will make us happy or, for most, give our life a sense of
purpose. As humans we deserve the unalienable rights of
“life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” No one should be
denied the right to be happy. But what makes one person “happier”
than another?
The concept of happiness is ambiguous
to each individual, what makes one person happy might not necessarily
be the same thing that makes another person happy. Theres's no right
or wrong way to be happy, happiness is simply whatever brings you
pleasure. This leads to the question is there a right or a wrong way
to be happy? There's not, and as Bentham argues all pleasures are
equal in that they bring happiness. Happiness is just happiness and
while we can achieve happiness in a morally right or morally wrong
way that doesn’t not change the intrinsic value of happiness and
the benefits it brings us. Happiness is the same in all forms.
Technically speaking, there is not one thing that can make me happier
than something else, the intensity and the duration of my happiness
can increase or decrease but that doesn't change the benefits of the
happiness. Certain things like money and possessions can make us
happy, but research shows that experiences make us happier than
possessions and that an increase in income does improve quality of
life (to a certain point) but not necessarily well being or
happiness. Possessions bring a temporary sense of happiness, short
lived, while experiences and memories are long lasting sources of
happiness. Therefore, what effects and influences happiness are
factors such as duration, intensity, fecundity, and purity of our
actions.
Through an analysis of life expectancy,
economics, social support, freedom to make choices, and lack of
corruption the United Nations was able to rank countries according to
their overall levels of happiness. Denmark, Norway, and Switzerland
ranked as the happiest and received the highest scores in life
expectancy, economics, social support, and freedom and the lowest
scores in corruption. Psychological and medical studies show that
“happy” people live longer. According to CNN 25% of life
expectancy and one's ability to be happy is determined by genetics;
and the remaining 75% is determined by how and where you live—factors
that are associated with possible happiness. These percentages might
serve as an explanation as to why life expectancy and overall
happiness are directly correlated to the “happiest countries.”
These results indicate that living in a country with such benefits
increases life expectancy. And as stated above life expectancy is
more likely to increase in accordance with an individuals level of
happiness and well being. Over all well-being increases happiness.
These results indicate that factors such as money and possessions do
not influence levels of happiness and that happiness is derived from
not only your environment, but also your genetic predisposition to be
happy.
Shafer-Landau, Russ.The Fundamentals of Ethics. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford UP, 2010. Print.
http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/19/living/feat-project-happy-10-ways/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/20/health/happiness-wellbeing-health/index.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.