Showing posts with label Jack. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jack. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Nihilism and The World Around You


Shafer-Landau in chapter 20 of the Fundamentals of Ethics describes moral nihilism as those who “deny that there are any moral qualities (Shafer-Landau 306).” To simplify what Shafer-Landau said moral nihilism is the belief that says that nothing is right or wrong that there are no good or bad moral actions only facts. Shafer-argues this point by expressing that “Facts exists; values don’t” like the table is made of wood would be an acceptable fact, but since “values cannot be factual, and so cannot be true (Shafer-Landau 306).”
Take a moment close your eyes and think of a World without morals. To today’s standard it would be a world of chaos and something straight out of one of the many post apocalyptic movies where the value of human life is the cost of a bullet or a movement of a blade through human flesh. Every man, woman, and child exist in a world where they have to take what you can for yourself before some one else takes it for themselves World. This is what I believed was the fatal flaw “if widespread acceptance of a moral theory would yield disastrous results, then that theory is false (Shafer-Landau 310).”  As you can see from how I picture it moral nihilism would result in disastrous results and therefore has proven to be false.
 But Shafer-Landau points out a very interesting argument. For instance if celibacy is moral and everybody practiced it and refrained from having sex, then no babies would be born, therefore the worlds population would start decreasing. With a continued decrease in population and no babies to fill the void of the dead, towns would die out followed soon by cities then countries and finally the entire human population of the World. This is if I am not mistaken a disastrous result from following a moral theory that is widely accepted and hasn’t been proven to be false yet. Therefore the argument of disastrous result cannot be used to disprove of the moral theory of moral nihilism.
The next way I tried to disprove moral nihilism is the fact that people are moral in their ways of life but some are just more apparent than others. So I sat down by the Hub and watched people’s actions for a while. I saw a guy pick up a book that a girl dropped talked to her for a while wrote down her number and parted ways surely that is a sign or morals, helping someone without asking for anything in return. But then after thinking for a while this action could be interpreted as a guy trying to get something for himself, in this case the woman’s number, instead of helping someone else out.

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

A Cultural Divide


In 2006 a woman named Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani was sentenced to death. Although the death penalty is a highly contested subjected this is not what I am focusing on instead the argument here is the method of the death penalty in this case it takes place in Iran where a woman was convicted of adultery and involvement in the murder of her husband. This conviction carries the sentence of death by stoning, which is highly contested worldwide.

This is a great example of cultural relativism as seen in Shafer-Landau’s Fundamentals of Ethics because in Iranian culture this is an acceptable way to carry out the execution because of how Islamic law dictates it. But in a different cultural setting, anywhere that is not an Islamic state, would see this as inhumane and terrible way to carry out the death sentence.

Source-
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/11/22/iran.stoning.sentence/index.html